BankConductIndex

Firms ›

Clydesdale Bank Plc

Legal entity: Clydesdale Bank Plc

Group: Virgin Money

FCA register status: Authorised — the FCA’s own status for this firm reference, not our finding. See the FCA’s own record on the Financial Services Register.

Companies House SC001111, incorporated April 1882

1,809banking decisions
25.6%uphold rate
1,346not upheld

Beyond banking

The figures above cover this firm’s banking, credit and mortgage decisions only. The Ombudsman also decided complaints about it in other sectors, which behave differently and are kept separate rather than averaged in.

SectorDecisionsUphold rate
Banking, credit and mortgages — shown above1,80925.6%
Payment protection insurance50329.2%
Investments and pensions7045.7%
Insurance (excluding PPI)11—

What this firm loses on

IssueDecisionsUpheldUphold rate
Service failure27611943.1%
Complaint handling2639636.5%
Irresponsible lending2416928.6%
Product mis-sold2344418.8%
Mortgage administration1914624.1%
Charges and fees1714526.3%
Card dispute or chargeback1564528.8%
APP scam refund refused1503221.3%
Credit file reporting1395841.7%
Account closed or refused1352921.5%
Treatment in financial difficulty902426.7%
Interest and rates822226.8%
Payment delayed or failed772532.5%
Unauthorised transaction672029.9%
Support for vulnerable customers612642.6%
Funds blocked or frozen611423.0%
Identity checks and access36822.2%
Data and privacy22522.7%
Bereavement and power of attorney11436.4%

The official record

What the firm itself reports to the regulator, scoped to banking and credit complaints only. This is a different measure from the decisions above — it covers all complaints a firm received, not only those that reached an ombudsman. Firms report on periods set by the regulator, which are not always the calendar half-year the file was published under (shown below where they differ). No period-over-period change is calculated here — these are the reported figures only. See the scorecard for all three measures side by side.

SourcePeriodUpheldOpenedClosedNew cases
FCA2025-H2
2025-04-01 to 2025-09-30
64.1%31,99332,307—
FCA2025-H1
2024-10-01 to 2025-03-31
66.2%29,81933,450—
FCA2024-H2
2024-04-01 to 2024-09-30
72.5%35,19132,947—
FCA2024-H1
2023-10-01 to 2024-03-31
71.9%32,22131,343—
FCA2023-H2
2023-04-01 to 2023-09-30
71.5%31,75832,896—
FCA2023-H1
2022-10-01 to 2023-03-31
80.4%32,15043,800—
FCA2022-H2
2022-04-01 to 2022-09-30
79.5%32,42926,165—
FCA2022-H1
2021-10-01 to 2022-03-31
76.2%28,39523,802—
FOS2025-H227.1%——1,577
FOS2025-H131.8%——1,065
FOS2024-H232.0%——839
FOS2024-H139.5%——744
FOS2023-H237.7%——798
FOS2023-H142.0%——1,240
FOS2022-H236.0%——1,081
FOS2022-H133.4%——741

What the regulator did

FCA final notices naming this firm. This is a separate record from the Ombudsman decisions above: the Ombudsman resolves individual complaints, the FCA penalises the firm for rule breaches.

DatePenaltyBreach
14 Apr 2015£20,678,300For breaching Principle 6 of the Authority's Principles.
24 Sept 2013£8,904,000For failing to treat its mortgage customers fairly.

Decisions are attributed to a firm only where the decision text names it unambiguously. Where a name could refer to more than one firm, the decision is left unattributed rather than guessed, so these counts are a floor, not a total. Method.