BankConductIndex

Firms ›

Barclays Bank Plc

Legal entity: Barclays Bank Plc

Group: Barclays

FCA register status: Authorised — the FCA’s own status for this firm reference, not our finding. See the FCA’s own record on the Financial Services Register.

Companies House 01026167, incorporated October 1971

6,138banking decisions
22.2%uphold rate
4,778not upheld

Beyond banking

The figures above cover this firm’s banking, credit and mortgage decisions only. The Ombudsman also decided complaints about it in other sectors, which behave differently and are kept separate rather than averaged in.

SectorDecisionsUphold rate
Banking, credit and mortgages — shown above6,13822.2%
Payment protection insurance1,78926.4%
Investments and pensions56040.9%
Insurance (excluding PPI)9725.8%

What this firm loses on

IssueDecisionsUpheldUphold rate
Product mis-sold1,22021317.5%
Complaint handling97230331.2%
Charges and fees71817724.7%
Service failure70424134.2%
Credit file reporting69324635.5%
Mortgage administration59617729.7%
Account closed or refused58813222.4%
Unauthorised transaction4589320.3%
APP scam refund refused4097017.1%
Card dispute or chargeback3976215.6%
Treatment in financial difficulty3366719.9%
Payment delayed or failed3129329.8%
Interest and rates2354117.4%
Irresponsible lending2315021.6%
Funds blocked or frozen2005527.5%
Support for vulnerable customers1524328.3%
Data and privacy1253225.6%
Identity checks and access933032.3%
Bereavement and power of attorney461634.8%

The official record

What the firm itself reports to the regulator, scoped to banking and credit complaints only. This is a different measure from the decisions above — it covers all complaints a firm received, not only those that reached an ombudsman. Firms report on periods set by the regulator, which are not always the calendar half-year the file was published under (shown below where they differ). No period-over-period change is calculated here — these are the reported figures only. See the scorecard for all three measures side by side.

SourcePeriodUpheldOpenedClosedNew cases
FCA2025-H2
2025-07-01 to 2025-12-31
60.2%9,29310,097—
FCA2025-H1
2025-01-01 to 2025-06-30
62.5%9,5138,995—
FCA2024-H2
2024-07-01 to 2024-12-31
60.9%8,3368,337—
FCA2024-H1
2024-01-01 to 2024-06-30
68.2%9,6009,568—
FCA2023-H2
2023-07-01 to 2023-12-31
68.8%8,3858,687—
FCA2023-H1
2023-01-01 to 2023-06-30
68.4%8,6798,298—
FCA2022-H2
2022-07-01 to 2022-12-31
70.9%7,4227,506—
FCA2022-H1
2022-01-01 to 2022-06-30
70.3%8,1747,995—
FOS2025-H232.0%——111
FOS2025-H129.0%——53
FOS2024-H232.0%——59
FOS2024-H128.0%——72
FOS2023-H231.0%——45
FOS2023-H119.2%——54
FOS2022-H224.0%——30
FOS2022-H117.0%——32

What the regulator did

FCA final notices naming this firm. This is a separate record from the Ombudsman decisions above: the Ombudsman resolves individual complaints, the FCA penalises the firm for rule breaches.

DatePenaltyBreach
14 Jul 2025£39,314,700This Final Notice refers to a breach of Principle 2 (skill, care and diligence) of the Authority’s Principles for Businesses that occurred between 9 January 2015 and 23 April 2021. Barclays’ breach relates to its failures to identify, assess, monitor and manage adequately the money laundering risks associated with the provision of banking services to one of its corporate banking customers.
25 Nov 2024£10,000,000This Final Notice refers to breaches of listing rules relating to failure to disclose information in the issuer sector. We imposed a financial penalty.
25 Nov 2024£30,000,000This Final Notice refers to breaches of listing rules relating to failure to disclose information in the issuer sector. We imposed a financial penalty.
28 Feb 2022£783,800This Final Notice refers to breaches of PRIN 2 related to financial crime in the corporate banking sector. We imposed a financial penalty.
26 Nov 2015£72,069,400For breaching Principle 2.
20 May 2015£284,432,000For breaching Principle 3 of the Authority's Principles for Businesses.
23 Sept 2014£37,745,000For failing to properly protect clients’ safe custody assets worth £16.5 billion.
23 May 2014£26,033,500For failing to adequately manage conflicts of interest between itself and its customers as well as systems and controls failings, in relation to the Gold Fixing.

Decisions are attributed to a firm only where the decision text names it unambiguously. Where a name could refer to more than one firm, the decision is left unattributed rather than guessed, so these counts are a floor, not a total. Method.