BankConductIndex

Firms ›

Bank of Scotland Plc

Legal entity: Bank of Scotland plc

FCA register status: Authorised — the FCA’s own status for this firm reference, not our finding. See the FCA’s own record on the Financial Services Register.

Companies House SC327000, incorporated September 2007

7,749banking decisions
17.5%uphold rate
6,390not upheld

Beyond banking

The figures above cover this firm’s banking, credit and mortgage decisions only. The Ombudsman also decided complaints about it in other sectors, which behave differently and are kept separate rather than averaged in.

SectorDecisionsUphold rate
Banking, credit and mortgages — shown above7,74917.5%
Payment protection insurance4,8698.1%
Insurance (excluding PPI)66244.1%
Investments and pensions28927.3%

What this firm loses on

IssueDecisionsUpheldUphold rate
Mortgage administration1,07522520.9%
Product mis-sold1,010757.4%
Complaint handling99927927.9%
APP scam refund refused99814514.5%
Service failure82026932.8%
Charges and fees76218724.5%
Credit file reporting70018226.0%
Treatment in financial difficulty62613120.9%
Account closed or refused5318816.6%
Unauthorised transaction5236813.0%
Card dispute or chargeback4977014.1%
Irresponsible lending4339922.9%
Interest and rates3736116.4%
Support for vulnerable customers3089029.2%
Payment delayed or failed2906221.4%
Funds blocked or frozen2527831.0%
Data and privacy1614226.1%
Identity checks and access1321914.4%
Bereavement and power of attorney681623.5%

The official record

What the firm itself reports to the regulator, scoped to banking and credit complaints only. This is a different measure from the decisions above — it covers all complaints a firm received, not only those that reached an ombudsman. Firms report on periods set by the regulator, which are not always the calendar half-year the file was published under (shown below where they differ). No period-over-period change is calculated here — these are the reported figures only. See the scorecard for all three measures side by side.

SourcePeriodUpheldOpenedClosedNew cases
FCA2025-H2
2025-07-01 to 2025-12-31
70.2%67,07164,931—
FCA2025-H1
2025-01-01 to 2025-06-30
68.9%65,33764,180—
FCA2024-H2
2024-07-01 to 2024-12-31
67.6%61,36660,234—
FCA2024-H1
2024-01-01 to 2024-06-30
64.5%63,89664,791—
FCA2023-H2
2023-07-01 to 2023-12-31
67.0%70,36870,984—
FCA2023-H1
2023-01-01 to 2023-06-30
67.5%72,60571,530—
FCA2022-H2
2022-07-01 to 2022-12-31
70.0%69,21469,632—
FCA2022-H1
2022-01-01 to 2022-06-30
66.5%71,57170,992—
FOS2025-H226.0%——3,727
FOS2025-H131.0%——2,518
FOS2024-H231.0%——2,399
FOS2024-H134.3%——2,640
FOS2023-H232.2%——2,368
FOS2023-H134.1%——2,335
FOS2022-H229.5%——1,971
FOS2022-H128.2%——1,914

What the regulator did

FCA final notices naming this firm. This is a separate record from the Ombudsman decisions above: the Ombudsman resolves individual complaints, the FCA penalises the firm for rule breaches.

DatePenaltyBreach
21 Jun 2019£45,500,000This final notice refers to breaches of PRIN 11 and SUP, relating to failing to be open and cooperative in the retail banking sector. We imposed a fine.

Context

Current account switching

Net customers gained or lost through the switching service.

QuarterGainsLossesNet
Q1-20267624,279-3,517
Q4-20257454,165-3,420
Q2-20251,0762,896-1,820
Q1-20251,1342,984-1,850

Open Banking API availability

Mean of the unweighted figure across endpoint categories, as published by Open Banking. Unweighted takes the worst endpoint per day, so it reflects what a customer hits rather than a volume-weighted average that healthy endpoints can carry.

2026-07: 100.00%

Decisions are attributed to a firm only where the decision text names it unambiguously. Where a name could refer to more than one firm, the decision is left unattributed rather than guessed, so these counts are a floor, not a total. Method.