BankConductIndex

Firms ›

The Royal Bank of Scotland Plc

157banking decisions
17.8%uphold rate
129not upheld

Beyond banking

The figures above cover this firm’s banking, credit and mortgage decisions only. The Ombudsman also decided complaints about it in other sectors, which behave differently and are kept separate rather than averaged in.

SectorDecisionsUphold rate
Banking, credit and mortgages — shown above15717.8%
Payment protection insurance26—
Investments and pensions19—

What this firm loses on

IssueDecisionsUpheldUphold rate
Charges and fees3313.0%
Complaint handling28725.0%
Mortgage administration22522.7%
Service failure22627.3%
Irresponsible lending2000.0%
Treatment in financial difficulty19210.5%
Credit file reporting17423.5%
Support for vulnerable customers13430.8%
Interest and rates12216.7%
Funds blocked or frozen11218.2%
Product mis-sold10330.0%

The official record

What the firm itself reports to the regulator, scoped to banking and credit complaints only. This is a different measure from the decisions above — it covers all complaints a firm received, not only those that reached an ombudsman. Firms report on periods set by the regulator, which are not always the calendar half-year the file was published under (shown below where they differ). No period-over-period change is calculated here — these are the reported figures only. See the scorecard for all three measures side by side.

SourcePeriodUpheldOpenedClosedNew cases
FCA2025-H2
2025-07-01 to 2025-12-31
59.1%18,54418,093—
FCA2025-H1
2025-01-01 to 2025-06-30
62.0%18,64217,936—
FCA2024-H2
2024-07-01 to 2024-12-31
64.9%18,05317,910—
FCA2024-H1
2024-01-01 to 2024-06-30
66.2%18,62519,282—
FCA2023-H2
2023-07-01 to 2023-12-31
75.6%16,00515,539—
FCA2023-H1
2023-01-01 to 2023-06-30
78.3%15,29215,575—
FCA2022-H2
2022-07-01 to 2022-12-31
77.5%15,37915,339—
FCA2022-H1
2022-01-01 to 2022-06-30
77.2%16,33915,918—
FOS2025-H134.4%——618
FOS2024-H237.0%——599
FOS2024-H146.0%——597
FOS2023-H238.0%——588
FOS2023-H141.0%——692
FOS2022-H239.6%——605
FOS2022-H137.5%——565
FOS2021-H243.2%——552

What the regulator did

FCA final notices naming this firm. This is a separate record from the Ombudsman decisions above: the Ombudsman resolves individual complaints, the FCA penalises the firm for rule breaches.

DatePenaltyBreach
11 Nov 2014£217,000,000For failing to take reasonable care to organise and control its affairs responsibly and effectively with adequate risk management systems in relation to G10 spot FX voice trading in London.

Context

Open Banking API availability

Mean of the unweighted figure across endpoint categories, as published by Open Banking. Unweighted takes the worst endpoint per day, so it reflects what a customer hits rather than a volume-weighted average that healthy endpoints can carry.

2026-07: 99.99%

Decisions are attributed to a firm only where the decision text names it unambiguously. Where a name could refer to more than one firm, the decision is left unattributed rather than guessed, so these counts are a floor, not a total. Method.