Firms › Topaz Finance Limited ›
Topaz Finance Limited
Financial Ombudsman decision DRN-4870027 Upheld
Upheldoutcome, as published by the Ombudsman
£300redress stated in the decision
Thu Sep 26deadline to accept (not the decision date)
The Ombudsman does not print a decision date. The date above is the deadline the consumer was given to accept or reject the decision, which is set about a month after it was issued. It is reliable to the year, not to the month.
What this decision was about
In the Ombudsman’s words
Mr W complains that Topaz Finance Limited trading as Rosinca Mortgages said it would agree to a second charge, in the form of a bridging loan, being secured on the property that it holds a first charge over, but then later said no.Mortgage administration
Source
This page summarises the Ombudsman’s published final decision. The document itself is the record: DRN-4870027.pdf on financial-ombudsman.org.uk.
The outcome shown is the Ombudsman’s own published classification, not our reading of the text. Nothing here is legal advice, and a decision concerns only the complaint it was made about.