BankConductIndex

Firms › Blue Motor Finance Limited ›

Blue Motor Finance Limited

Financial Ombudsman decision DRN-6168276 Not upheld

Not upheldoutcome, as published by the Ombudsman
—no sum stated
Mon Mar 23deadline to accept (not the decision date)

The Ombudsman does not print a decision date. The date above is the deadline the consumer was given to accept or reject the decision, which is set about a month after it was issued. It is reliable to the year, not to the month.

What this decision was about

Credit file reporting, Product mis-sold

In the Ombudsman’s words

BMF later accepted that adverse information should not have been recorded in the circumstances, agreed to amend Mr K’s credit fileCredit file reporting
Mr K complained that he had not been offered or advised about GAP insurance at the outset of the agreement.Product mis-sold

Source

This page summarises the Ombudsman’s published final decision. The document itself is the record: DRN-6168276.pdf on financial-ombudsman.org.uk.

The outcome shown is the Ombudsman’s own published classification, not our reading of the text. Nothing here is legal advice, and a decision concerns only the complaint it was made about.