BankConductIndex

Firms › NATIONAL WESTMINSTER BANK PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY ›

NATIONAL WESTMINSTER BANK PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY

Financial Ombudsman decision DRN-5404812 Partly upheld

Partly upheldoutcome, as published by the Ombudsman
£300redress stated in the decision
Mon Apr 21deadline to accept (not the decision date)

The Ombudsman does not print a decision date. The date above is the deadline the consumer was given to accept or reject the decision, which is set about a month after it was issued. It is reliable to the year, not to the month.

What this decision was about

Mortgage administration, Complaint handling

In the Ombudsman’s words

Mr J and Ms W complain that, although NATIONAL WESTMINSTER BANK PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY previously agreed to give them a mortgage and then twice to extend their mortgage borrowing, when they asked to increase the borrowing again, NatWest’s survey said the property wasn’t suitable security.Mortgage administration
Mr J and Ms W said that they were treated very badly when they complained. They said NatWest’s agents were rude.Complaint handling

Source

This page summarises the Ombudsman’s published final decision. The document itself is the record: DRN-5404812.pdf on financial-ombudsman.org.uk.

The outcome shown is the Ombudsman’s own published classification, not our reading of the text. Nothing here is legal advice, and a decision concerns only the complaint it was made about.