BankConductIndex

Firms ›

FCE Bank Plc

Legal entity: FCE Bank Plc

FCA register status: Authorised — the FCA’s own status for this firm reference, not our finding. See the FCA’s own record on the Financial Services Register.

Companies House 00772784, incorporated September 1963

168banking decisions
34.5%uphold rate
110not upheld

Beyond banking

The figures above cover this firm’s banking, credit and mortgage decisions only. The Ombudsman also decided complaints about it in other sectors, which behave differently and are kept separate rather than averaged in.

SectorDecisionsUphold rate
Banking, credit and mortgages — shown above16834.5%
Payment protection insurance2—

What this firm loses on

IssueDecisionsUpheldUphold rate
Product mis-sold321237.5%
Credit file reporting311548.4%
Charges and fees17635.3%
Irresponsible lending1317.7%

The official record

What the firm itself reports to the regulator, scoped to banking and credit complaints only. This is a different measure from the decisions above — it covers all complaints a firm received, not only those that reached an ombudsman. Firms report on periods set by the regulator, which are not always the calendar half-year the file was published under (shown below where they differ). No period-over-period change is calculated here — these are the reported figures only. See the scorecard for all three measures side by side.

SourcePeriodUpheldOpenedClosedNew cases
FCA2025-H2
2025-07-01 to 2025-12-31
55.6%154169—
FCA2024-H2
2024-07-01 to 2024-12-31
55.3%146150—
FCA2024-H1
2024-01-01 to 2024-06-30
34.8%94115—
FCA2023-H2
2023-07-01 to 2023-12-31
38.8%172147—
FCA2023-H1
2023-01-01 to 2023-06-30
25.2%106115—
FCA2022-H2
2022-07-01 to 2022-12-31
15.7%124121—
FCA2022-H1
2022-01-01 to 2022-06-30
45.3%10195—
FCA2021-H2
2021-07-01 to 2021-12-31
39.7%7673—
FOS2025-H21.4%——455
FOS2025-H124.2%——10,465
FOS2024-H226.0%——6,528
FOS2024-H110.7%——733
FOS2023-H222.6%——210
FOS2023-H125.8%——101
FOS2022-H123.3%——58
FOS2021-H243.1%——36

Decisions are attributed to a firm only where the decision text names it unambiguously. Where a name could refer to more than one firm, the decision is left unattributed rather than guessed, so these counts are a floor, not a total. Method.