Mitsubishi HC Capital UK Plc

Financial Ombudsman decision DRN-5051727 Upheld

Upheldoutcome, as published by the Ombudsman

—no sum stated

Thu Jan 31deadline to accept (not the decision date)

The Ombudsman does not print a decision date. The date above is the deadline the consumer was given to accept or reject the decision, which is set about a month after it was issued. It is reliable to the year, not to the month.

What this decision was about

Product mis-sold

In the Ombudsman’s words

A court would likely find an unfair relationship had been created between Mr R and Mitsubishi because the estimated benefits of the system were based on annual generation of 1,931 kWh but this did not take into account any shading of the solar panels.Product mis-sold

Rules cited

Consumer Credit Act 1974, FCA DISP (Dispute Resolution)

Source

This page summarises the Ombudsman’s published final decision. The document itself is the record: DRN-5051727.pdf on financial-ombudsman.org.uk.

The outcome shown is the Ombudsman’s own published classification, not our reading of the text. Nothing here is legal advice, and a decision concerns only the complaint it was made about.