BankConductIndex

Firms › Telefonica UK Limited ›

Telefonica UK Limited

Financial Ombudsman decision DRN-3961894 Not upheld

Not upheldoutcome, as published by the Ombudsman
—no sum stated
Mon Mar 20deadline to accept (not the decision date)

The Ombudsman does not print a decision date. The date above is the deadline the consumer was given to accept or reject the decision, which is set about a month after it was issued. It is reliable to the year, not to the month.

What this decision was about

Product mis-sold

In the Ombudsman’s words

Mr M told O2 he’d been mis-sold his insurance policy because he’d not been made aware he’d be required to pay an excess when making a claim, or that he’d be provided with a refurbished device, rather than a new one.Product mis-sold

Source

This page summarises the Ombudsman’s published final decision. The document itself is the record: DRN-3961894.pdf on financial-ombudsman.org.uk.

The outcome shown is the Ombudsman’s own published classification, not our reading of the text. Nothing here is legal advice, and a decision concerns only the complaint it was made about.